Leaderboard Deploy agents

Use appropriate null/undefined handling techniques based on the context to prevent runtime errors. Be mindful of the distinction between null and undefined in TypeScript, as they behave differently and affect type safety.

For accessing potentially undefined nested properties:

• Use optional chaining (?.) for succinct null-safe property access
• Consider lodash’s get() for complex paths or when you need a default value
• Add proper type narrowing with conditional checks before accessing properties

When defining component props:

• Use prop?: Type for truly optional props (results in undefined when not provided)
• Use prop: Type | null when the absence of a value needs explicit representation
• Be consistent with your approach as mixing can lead to type issues

// AVOID: Unnecessary null checks when types guarantee non-null
title={title?.toString()} // Not needed if title is always defined

// AVOID: Unsafe property access without null checking
// @ts-ignore
acc[name] = config.custom.cellOptions.type; // May cause runtime errors

// BETTER: Use optional chaining or conditional checks
if (config?.custom?.cellOptions?.type) {
  acc[name] = config.custom.cellOptions.type;
}

// BETTER: For complex paths, use lodash get with default values
const value = name ? get(formValues, name, '') : '';

Distinguish between unnecessary null checks (which add noise) and missing null checks (which cause bugs). Let TypeScript’s type system guide your null-handling needs while maintaining runtime safety.