Awesome Reviewers checks + prompts

Intent and spec conformance

Compares the change to what was asked for: the ticket, the plan or spec, the design, the review comments it was meant to address.

When: When a change implements a ticket, a plan or a design, and before merging, to confirm the thing built is the thing requested.

VA08 tactic
7 techniques
14 sub-techniques
not detectable from CI configuration; no usage counts
ID Technique Description Sub
V1052 Ticket intent alignment Checks a finding or a change against the linked ticket: behaviour the ticket declares intentional is not a bug, and requirements it lists must be present. 2
V1053 Plan and spec traceability Checks each requirement in a plan or specification against the implementation: done in this change, done elsewhere, or not started, with gaps graded by severity. 2
V1054 Functional spec verification Runs the application and checks each functional requirement in a browser, returning met, partially met, not met or unverifiable with screenshot evidence. 2
V1055 Design conformance Compares the rendered UI with the design it implements and reports layout, spacing, colour and copy differences. 2
V1056 Review comment resolution Checks whether a new commit actually addresses each open review comment before the thread is resolved. 2
V1057 Merge readiness Combines checks, reviews, open threads and findings into one verdict on whether a change can merge. 2
V1058 Output guardrails Validates what an automated reviewer or fixer produces before it is posted or committed: schema, policy and safety checks. 2