Awesome Reviewers

Write AI prompt/workflow steps as deterministic contracts: remove ambiguity, force required lookups, gate behavior by mode, and make unattended/automation outputs schema-correct.

Apply these rules:

Example pattern:

## Output Contract
- If `{mode}` == `autonomous`, do **not** output conversational text.
- Always load reference docs in this order before step 1:
  1) `references/guide-contract.md`
  2) `references/evidence.md`

## Automation Mode (unattended)
After applying patches:
- Write `$AUTO_DIR/tasks/$TASK_ID/result.json` with:
  - `workflow`: "code-review"
  - `patched`: true iff patch-items were applied on disk
  - `deferred`: list iff deferred-work file append occurred
  - `dismissed`: count set aside to review ledger
  - `clean`: true iff status on disk is `done` and no escalations

If you follow the contract rules above, you prevent the common production failures: skipped lookups, wrong behavior in autonomous runs, schema ambiguity, and inconsistent classification across subagents.