Awesome Reviewers

When adding or modifying skill/workflow customization, treat configuration resolution as a deterministic contract with (a) exact merge semantics and (b) clear config ownership/lifecycle.

1) Define the merge semantics precisely (and mirror them in any fallback)

Use these structural rules consistently for every customizable section (agents, workflows, and hooks):

• Scalars: later wins
• Tables/objects: deep-merge
• Arrays that have code or id keys (menu-style): merge by key
• All other arrays: append

If you provide a “manual merge fallback” when the resolver script fails, the fallback must restate and implement the same rules above—otherwise base sections like principles, persistent_facts, or menu can be silently dropped.

2) Respect config file ownership and regeneration

Treat installer-emitted files as regenerated on every install (read-only for durability):

• _bmad/config.toml and _bmad/config.user.toml

For durable overrides, commit only:

• _bmad/custom/config.toml (team)
• _bmad/custom/config.user.toml (personal)

3) Standardize config loading + variable resolution

Across SKILL.md/workflow.md, load from the standard config and resolve variables via the agreed path conventions (e.g., {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml, and use placeholders like {user_name}, {communication_language}, {planning_artifacts} consistently). Avoid ad-hoc assumptions that diverge from the established pattern.

Example (merge semantics contract)

When documenting or implementing fallback merge behavior, explicitly write:

Merge rules:
- scalars: later wins
- tables: deep-merge
- arrays with {code,id}: merge by key
- other arrays: append

This site is open source. Improve this page.