Implement a clearly defined release strategy that distinguishes between different types of changes. Create separate workflows for patch releases (typo fixes, safe dependency updates, low-risk fixes) and non-patch releases (features, breaking changes): For patch releases: - Use direct commits to the main branch for simple, low-risk changes - Verify with appropriate tests before releasing - Document changes in a consistent format For non-patch releases: - Create dedicated feature branches (e.g., `4.13`, `5.0`) - Track changes through a release pull request that documents all included changes - Implement proper access controls for release automation - Consider using shared credentials stored securely for release publishing Example workflow for non-patch release: ``` # Create a new branch for the release git checkout -b 5.0 # Make and commit your changes ... # Open a release PR tracking all changes # Example: https://github.com/expressjs/express/pull/2682 # After review and approval, merge and publish npm version minor # or major for breaking changes git push origin --tags npm publish ``` This structured approach ensures changes are properly tracked, reviewed, and deployed according to their risk level, making the release process more predictable and maintainable.