Back to all reviewers

Consistent naming conventions

alacritty/alacritty
Based on 3 comments
Other

Maintain consistent naming patterns and capitalization throughout the codebase, especially for configuration options, string values, and identifiers. This includes using consistent capitalization for similar values (e.g., "None" instead of mixing "none" and "None"), adopting uniform naming patterns for related options (e.g., using "duration" consistently...

Naming Conventions Other

Reviewer Prompt

Maintain consistent naming patterns and capitalization throughout the codebase, especially for configuration options, string values, and identifiers. This includes using consistent capitalization for similar values (e.g., “None” instead of mixing “none” and “None”), adopting uniform naming patterns for related options (e.g., using “duration” consistently instead of verbose alternatives like “fade_time_in_secs”), and ensuring clear, consistent prefixes or patterns for grouped identifiers.

For example, instead of mixing capitalization:

# Inconsistent
*line_indicator* { foreground = "none", background = "none" }
*decorations* "Full" | "None" | "Transparent"

# Consistent  
*line_indicator* { foreground = "None", background = "None" }
*decorations* "Full" | "None" | "Transparent"

Similarly, prefer concise, consistent naming over verbose alternatives:

# Verbose and inconsistent
*fade_time_in_secs* <float>

# Concise and consistent with other duration options
*duration* <integer>

This approach reduces cognitive load, prevents confusion, and makes the codebase more maintainable by establishing predictable naming patterns that developers can rely on.

3
Comments Analyzed
Other
Primary Language
Naming Conventions
Category

Source Discussions