Back to all reviewers

Test organization standards

ant-design/ant-design
Based on 4 comments
TSX

Write tests that are well-organized, maintainable, and reflect real usage patterns. Test names should describe behavior and requirements rather than implementation details. Group related tests under appropriate describe blocks and avoid redundant test cases.

Testing TSX

Reviewer Prompt

Write tests that are well-organized, maintainable, and reflect real usage patterns. Test names should describe behavior and requirements rather than implementation details. Group related tests under appropriate describe blocks and avoid redundant test cases.

Key principles:

  • Name tests based on expected behavior: “should prevent multiple clicks when loading” instead of “should update loading state correctly when using ref”
  • Group related tests logically: Use one describe block per feature/component area rather than creating separate describes for single test cases
  • Test through realistic component usage patterns rather than isolated utility functions to ensure proper coverage
  • Remove or consolidate redundant tests when new test cases already cover the same scenarios
  • Extract complex test scenarios into dedicated test files (e.g., semantic.test.tsx) for better organization

Example of good test organization:

describe('CheckableTag', () => {
  it('should render icon when provided', () => {
    // Test icon rendering behavior
  });
  
  it('should handle click events correctly', () => {
    // Test click behavior
  });
  
  it('should support custom classNames and styles', () => {
    // Test styling behavior
  });
});

This approach makes tests easier to navigate, maintain, and ensures they accurately reflect how components are actually used in applications.

4
Comments Analyzed
TSX
Primary Language
Testing
Category

Source Discussions