When implementing performance optimizations, favor simple, straightforward approaches over complex solutions unless the complexity is clearly justified by significant performance gains. Complex optimizations often introduce maintenance burden, reduce code readability, and may not provide proportional benefits.
When implementing performance optimizations, favor simple, straightforward approaches over complex solutions unless the complexity is clearly justified by significant performance gains. Complex optimizations often introduce maintenance burden, reduce code readability, and may not provide proportional benefits.
Before implementing a complex optimization:
Example of preferred simple approach:
// Simple prefetching - preferred
if (prefetch_ahead > 0) {
__builtin_prefetch(current + prefetch_ahead);
}
// Instead of complex ring buffer implementation
Example of keeping codec selection simple:
// Prefer portable, simple codec selection
static constexpr auto CODEC_NAME = "simdfastpfor128";
static constexpr size_t THRESHOLD = 4;
// Instead of complex compile-time CPU feature detection
This approach reduces the risk of introducing bugs in performance-critical code while maintaining the primary performance benefits. Complex optimizations should be reserved for cases where profiling clearly demonstrates that simple approaches are insufficient and the performance gain justifies the added complexity.
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository