Awesome Reviewers expert instructions

domains / / continuedev/continue

CI script reliability practices

Ensure CI/CD workflows maintain reliability by following these practices: 1. **Use explicit script paths** - Always use explicit paths when invoking scripts (e.g., `./build.ps1` for PowerShell or `./build.sh` for bash) rather than relying on implicit path resolution. This ensures the runner can locate and execute scripts regardless of the current working...

raw .md CI/CD Yaml

Ensure CI/CD workflows maintain reliability by following these practices:

  1. Use explicit script paths - Always use explicit paths when invoking scripts (e.g., ./build.ps1 for PowerShell or ./build.sh for bash) rather than relying on implicit path resolution. This ensures the runner can locate and execute scripts regardless of the current working directory.

  2. Verify script existence - Confirm that all referenced script files and directories exist in the repository before merging workflow changes: ```yaml

    Before merging, verify that these paths exist:

    • name: Build packages (Windows) run: ./scripts/build-packages.ps1

    • name: Build packages (Unix) run: ./scripts/build-packages.sh ```

  3. Set execute permissions - Include a step to set execute permissions for shell scripts on Unix systems: ```yaml
    • name: Set permissions run: chmod +x ./build.sh

    • name: Build run: ./build.sh ```

  4. Handle secrets securely - Add conditional guards when using repository secrets to accommodate PRs from forks where secrets aren’t available: ```yaml
    • name: Run tests requiring API keys if: ${{ github.event_name != ‘pull_request’ || github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository }} run: npm test env: API_KEY: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }} ```

These practices will prevent common CI/CD failures and improve workflow reliability across different environments and contributor scenarios.