When implementing algorithms, prioritize using standard library functions over manual implementations when they provide equivalent or better performance. The standard library is typically optimized and well-tested, making it a more reliable choice for common operations.
When implementing algorithms, prioritize using standard library functions over manual implementations when they provide equivalent or better performance. The standard library is typically optimized and well-tested, making it a more reliable choice for common operations.
For example, instead of manually copying map entries:
// Avoid manual iteration
for k, v := range m {
c[k] = v
}
// Prefer standard library function
maps.Copy(c, m)
Similarly, for string operations, the standard library is often more efficient:
// Use strings.ToLower() instead of custom utilities
origin := strings.ToLower(c.Get(fiber.HeaderOrigin))
This approach reduces code complexity, leverages optimized implementations, and improves maintainability. The standard library functions are particularly efficient when input data is already in the expected format, as noted: “standard lib is faster if it is already lower case, which should be the case in most cases.”
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository