Prompt
Choose efficient implementation patterns that improve performance. Apply these optimizations throughout your code:
- Avoid redundant operations: Store results of expensive lookups rather than repeating them. ```go // Less efficient: searching for time field twice for _, f := range frame.Fields { if f.Type() == data.FieldTypeTime { timeField = f break } } // …later… for _, f := range frame.Fields { if f.Type() == data.FieldTypeTime { timeField = f break } }
// More efficient: store the reference timeField := timeFields[frame]
2. **Pre-allocate when size is known**: For collections with predictable sizes, pre-allocate to avoid resizing.
```go
// Pre-allocate with known capacity
rows := make([]row, 0, totalRows)
- Properly benchmark code: Use
b.ResetTimer()before the actual code being benchmarked to exclude setup time.func BenchmarkOperation(b *testing.B) { // Setup code data := prepareTestData() // Start measuring only the operation we care about b.ResetTimer() for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ { performOperation(data) } } - Optimize database operations: Choose the most appropriate database operation for your context. For example, after truncating a table, use regular inserts instead of upserts: ```go // Less efficient - using upsert after truncation if _, err := sess.Exec(“DELETE FROM alert_instance”); err != nil { return err } // Then using upserts
// More efficient - using regular inserts after truncation if _, err := sess.Exec(“DELETE FROM alert_instance”); err != nil { return err } // Then using regular inserts ```
Regularly profile your code with realistic data volumes to identify and address bottlenecks.