When using std::filesystem operations, prefer passing std::error_code parameters instead of relying on try-catch blocks for error handling. This approach provides better performance and more explicit error checking.
When using std::filesystem operations, prefer passing std::error_code parameters instead of relying on try-catch blocks for error handling. This approach provides better performance and more explicit error checking.
Most std::filesystem functions have overloads that accept an std::error_code reference parameter. Use these overloads and check the error code explicitly rather than catching exceptions.
Example:
// Avoid try-catch approach
try {
if (std::filesystem::exists(path) && std::filesystem::is_directory(path)) {
// process directory
}
} catch (...) {
// handle error
}
// Prefer error_code approach
std::error_code ec1, ec2;
if (std::filesystem::exists(path, ec1) && !ec1 &&
std::filesystem::is_directory(path, ec2) && !ec2) {
// process directory
} else if (ec1 || ec2) {
// handle specific errors
}
This pattern is especially important for operations like std::filesystem::exists()
, std::filesystem::is_directory()
, std::filesystem::canonical()
, and directory iteration where exceptions can be thrown for various system-level issues. The error_code approach allows for more granular error handling and avoids the performance overhead of exception handling in expected error scenarios.
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository