Back to all reviewers

Incremental dependency updates

BerriAI/litellm
Based on 2 comments
Txt

When updating dependencies in configuration files like requirements.txt, break large changes into smaller, focused pull requests that can be individually tested and validated. Each dependency update should include clear justification for why the change is necessary, especially when it triggers cascading updates to other packages.

Configurations Txt

Reviewer Prompt

When updating dependencies in configuration files like requirements.txt, break large changes into smaller, focused pull requests that can be individually tested and validated. Each dependency update should include clear justification for why the change is necessary, especially when it triggers cascading updates to other packages.

Before proposing dependency bumps, verify they are actually required by attempting to revert the changes and running the full test suite. If tests pass without the update, consider whether the dependency change is truly needed.

For example, when updating multiple packages:

# Instead of updating all at once:
# openai==1.40.0 -> 1.45.0
# google-cloud-aiplatform==1.50.0 -> 1.61.0  
# protobuf==4.25.0 -> 5.0.0

# Break into separate PRs:
# PR 1: Update openai to 1.45.0
# PR 2: Update protobuf to 5.0.0 (with justification)
# PR 3: Update google-cloud-aiplatform to 1.61.0 (if still needed)

This approach allows load testing and CI/CD validation of each change independently, making it easier to identify which specific update might cause issues and reducing the blast radius of potential problems.

2
Comments Analyzed
Txt
Primary Language
Configurations
Category

Source Discussions