Prompt
Always profile and measure performance impact before implementing optimizations, especially micro-optimizations. Many seemingly beneficial optimizations provide no measurable improvement and can hurt code maintainability.
Before adding performance optimizations:
- Use proper profiling tools to identify actual bottlenecks
- Measure the current performance with realistic workloads
- Implement the optimization
- Measure again to verify the improvement is significant
- Consider the maintenance cost vs. performance gain
Example from optimizer parameter pre-computation:
// Before: Micro-optimization attempt
const float keep = 1.0f - opt_pars.adamw.alpha * opt_pars.adamw.wd;
// After measurement: "the micro-optimization has no visible benefit in this case"
// Reverted to simpler, more maintainable code
Common scenarios where measurement reveals optimizations are ineffective:
- CPU-bound optimizations in I/O-bound operations
- Micro-optimizations in infrequently called code paths
- Complex optimizations with “microscopic” performance gains
- Operations that run once per request rather than per iteration
Use profiling-enabled tools when available (e.g., enqueue_nd_range for kernel timing) and prefer steady_clock over high_resolution_clock for accurate timing measurements. Remember that maintainability and code clarity often outweigh minimal performance gains.