Reliable Technical Documentation

When updating technical docs, ensure they are reliable in both what they claim and how developers can apply them:

• Keep headings/sections aligned with the exact runtime/build parameters shown in outputs (e.g., if the benchmark runs with gpu_device=0, reflect “GPU0” in the subsection title).
• Express requirements as constraints when that’s what’s true (e.g., “CMake >= 3.10” rather than only “CMake 3.10”) and update wording if other tested versions work.
• For troubleshooting, provide a complete, actionable flow: clear cause(s), prerequisites (what to install), concrete commands to run, and warnings about common pitfalls (e.g., avoid installing protobuf into system paths if it breaks version resolution).
• Use robust Markdown for plain URLs—wrap raw links in angle brackets to reduce rendering issues:

参考：<https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/128974102>

Practical checklist before merging a doc change: 1) Do section titles/subtitles match the commands and parameters in the text? 2) Are version statements accurate (use >= or range when appropriate)? 3) Can someone follow the steps from a clean environment to a working result? 4) Are there cautions for known failure modes (path conflicts, mismatched shared libraries)? 5) Do external links render consistently in Markdown?