Semantic Collision-Safe Naming

All identifiers should be (1) semantically clear, (2) consistent with project naming patterns, and (3) collision-safe.

Apply this checklist:

• Prefer clear, domain-meaningful names for configuration fields (avoid ambiguous terms like resize_type when the concept is “mode/sample_type”).
  • Prefer names like mode / sample_type and keep comments consistent with the chosen name.
• For enum values, use explicit, scoped-like prefixes (especially when relying on C++11 enum scoping is optional).
  • Example:

    enum InterpolationMode {
        Interpolation_BILINEAR = 1,
        Interpolation_Nearest = 2,
        Interpolation_BICUBIC = 3
    };
    

• Do not use leading underscore for member/attribute identifiers (e.g., avoid int _axis; use int axis).
• Avoid non-English transliterations (e.g., don’t introduce identifiers using Chinese Pinyin when an English/technical term exists).
• For macros/externally visible identifiers, always use project-qualified names to prevent collisions (e.g., replace forceinline with NCNN_FORCE_INLINE).

Result: names communicate intent, remain consistent across the codebase, and won’t conflict with external code or platform headers.