Focus optimization efforts on performance-critical paths rather than applying micro-optimizations everywhere. Balance code clarity and maintainability against performance gains, and only optimize when there's a measurable benefit.
Focus optimization efforts on performance-critical paths rather than applying micro-optimizations everywhere. Balance code clarity and maintainability against performance gains, and only optimize when there’s a measurable benefit.
When considering optimizations:
For example, avoid premature optimization in code like this:
// PREFER: Simple and clear approach for non-critical code
for (int bucketno = 0; bucketno < NUM_QT_BUCKETS; bucketno++) {
uint64 threshold = qt_bucket_thresholds[bucketno];
metrics[i].bucket_le = (threshold == UINT64_MAX) ? INFINITY : ((double) threshold) / 1000000.0;
}
// AVOID: Premature optimization making code less clear
for (int bucketno = 0; bucketno < NUM_QT_BUCKETS - 1; bucketno++) {
metrics[i].bucket_le = ((double) qt_bucket_thresholds[bucketno]) / 1000000.0;
}
// Special case for last bucket
metrics[NUM_QT_BUCKETS-1].bucket_le = INFINITY;
However, when there’s significant performance impact (like looping from 3 to INT_MAX), optimization becomes necessary. Always document performance-critical sections and the rationale behind optimization decisions.
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository