Back to all reviewers

reuse concurrency infrastructure

neovim/neovim
Based on 3 comments
Other

Avoid implementing custom concurrency patterns when existing infrastructure is available. Before creating new debouncing, async/await, or parallel execution code, check if suitable implementations already exist in the codebase.

Concurrency Other

Reviewer Prompt

Avoid implementing custom concurrency patterns when existing infrastructure is available. Before creating new debouncing, async/await, or parallel execution code, check if suitable implementations already exist in the codebase.

For example, instead of implementing a custom debounce function:

local function debunce(f, timeout)
  local timer = nil
  return function(...)
    local args = { ... }
    if timer then
      vim.uv.timer_stop(timer)
      timer:close()
      timer = nil
    end
    timer = assert(vim.uv.new_timer())
    vim.uv.timer_start(timer, timeout, 0, vim.schedule_wrap(function()
      if timer then
        vim.uv.timer_stop(timer)
        timer:close()
        timer = nil
      end
      f(unpack(args))
    end))
  end
end

Reuse existing debouncing infrastructure like next_debounce in lsp/_changetracking.lua. Similarly, prefer established async patterns like vim.async.await(3, vim.system, cmd, opts) over manual coroutine implementations.

This reduces code duplication, ensures consistent behavior across the codebase, and leverages battle-tested concurrency primitives that handle edge cases and performance optimizations.

3
Comments Analyzed
Other
Primary Language
Concurrency
Category

Source Discussions