Consistent descriptive naming

Use clear, descriptive names that follow consistent patterns established in the codebase and broader programming standards. This includes:

1. Choose unambiguous function names that clearly communicate purpose and behavior: ```cpp // Poor: Hard to understand what it does and how it differs from copyTo() void overwriteTo(OutputArray m) const;

// Better: Clearer indication of behavior void writeTo(OutputArray m) const;

2. Avoid unnecessary abbreviations when clarity would be improved:
```cpp
// Poor: Ambiguous abbreviation
CV_WRAP void computeCCM();

// Better: Clear meaning
CV_WRAP Mat computeColorCorrectionMatrix();

1. Use all capital letters with underscores for constants and enums: ```cpp // Poor: Inconsistent capitalization enum ColorCheckerType { COLORCHECKER_Macbeth, COLORCHECKER_Vinyl };

// Better: Consistent all-caps for constants enum ColorCheckerType { COLORCHECKER_MACBETH, COLORCHECKER_VINYL };

4. Follow established naming patterns for related classes or components:
```cpp
// Poor: Inconsistent with existing naming patterns
enum DisposalMethod {
    GRFMT_GIF_Nothing = 0,
    GRFMT_GIF_PreviousImage = 1
};

// Better: Consistent naming pattern
enum GifDisposeMethod {
    GIF_DISPOSE_NONE = 1,
    GIF_DISPOSE_RESTORE_PREVIOUS = 3
};

1. Name setters with ‘set’ prefix for clarity: ```cpp // Poor: Confusing whether this is getter or setter int paletteSize(int setPaletteSize = 0);

// Better: Clear indication this is a setter int setPaletteSize(int size); ```

This approach leads to more maintainable, readable, and self-documenting code while preserving consistency across the codebase.