Back to all reviewers

validate schema decisions

PostHog/posthog
Based on 2 comments
Other

When reviewing database schema changes or data structure modifications, ensure that field inclusion/exclusion decisions are explicitly justified and documented. Question ambiguous schema choices and require clear rationale for data organization patterns.

Database Other

Reviewer Prompt

When reviewing database schema changes or data structure modifications, ensure that field inclusion/exclusion decisions are explicitly justified and documented. Question ambiguous schema choices and require clear rationale for data organization patterns.

Schema decisions should address:

  • Why specific fields are included or omitted (e.g., “Do we need team_id in addition to person_id and event_name?”)
  • How the chosen structure supports expected query patterns
  • Whether data access methods are intuitive for developers

Example from schema design:

-- Migration: Create person event occurrences table
-- Question: Is team_id necessary alongside person_id and event_name?
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS person_event_occurrences (
    team_id INT,  -- Rationale needed: Does this enable required queries?
    person_id TEXT,
    event_name TEXT
);

When data property references seem unclear or confusing (like choosing between $groups: { key: value } vs $group_0), document the reasoning behind the chosen approach and consider developer experience in accessing the data.

2
Comments Analyzed
Other
Primary Language
Database
Category

Source Discussions