Back to all reviewers

avoid unnecessary complexity

TanStack/router
Based on 3 comments
Markdown

Remove code complexity that doesn't provide clear value, particularly in type definitions, configuration options, and formatting constraints. This includes eliminating redundant type omissions, using descriptive names for configuration options, and avoiding formatting rules that conflict with user preferences.

Code Style Markdown

Reviewer Prompt

Remove code complexity that doesn’t provide clear value, particularly in type definitions, configuration options, and formatting constraints. This includes eliminating redundant type omissions, using descriptive names for configuration options, and avoiding formatting rules that conflict with user preferences.

Examples of unnecessary complexity to avoid:

  • Omitting types that get overwritten anyway: Omit<ButtonProps, 'href'> when href is replaced by the framework
  • Generic configuration names: use routeFileFormatter instead of just formatter
  • Formatting constraints that assume specific code structure and conflict with user style preferences

The goal is to maintain clean, readable code without imposing arbitrary style restrictions or type gymnastics that don’t serve a functional purpose. When in doubt, prefer simpler approaches that give users more control over their code style.

3
Comments Analyzed
Markdown
Primary Language
Code Style
Category

Source Discussions