When modifying configuration systems, prioritize backward compatibility unless there's an explicit breaking change planned. If a breaking change is necessary, implement compatibility handlers for older configurations and clearly communicate the transition plan.
When modifying configuration systems, prioritize backward compatibility unless there’s an explicit breaking change planned. If a breaking change is necessary, implement compatibility handlers for older configurations and clearly communicate the transition plan.
For example, when modifying configuration enums or data structures:
// When adding new configuration values, append them rather than reordering
// to maintain compatibility with serialized configurations
enum ConfigValues
{
// Existing values - don't change these ids
Value1 = 1,
Value2 = 2,
// New values - add at the end
NewValue = 3
}
// For major changes, implement version detection and compatibility handling
public ProcessConfig(ConfigData data)
{
if (data.Version < CurrentVersion) {
// Handle older format compatibility
return ProcessLegacyConfig(data);
}
// Process current format
}
This approach ensures tools and systems can continue to process configurations from previous versions, maintaining reliability across version updates. As seen in the discussions, breaking configuration compatibility (like removing enum definitions) can break tools that need to process older versions, requiring changes to be reverted or additional compatibility code to be written.
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository