When implementing caching solutions, clearly document and justify your caching strategy decisions based on access patterns, performance requirements, and complexity trade-offs. Consider whether the benefits of complex caching approaches outweigh simpler alternatives.
When implementing caching solutions, clearly document and justify your caching strategy decisions based on access patterns, performance requirements, and complexity trade-offs. Consider whether the benefits of complex caching approaches outweigh simpler alternatives.
For cache duration decisions, align TTL with content characteristics - static assets can use longer durations (days/weeks), while dynamic data may need shorter periods. For cache loading strategies, evaluate whether preloading provides sufficient performance benefits over on-demand caching to justify the additional complexity.
Example from the discussions:
// Good: Justified preload strategy with clear reasoning
func (r *ClickHouseReader) PreloadMetricsMetadata(ctx context.Context, orgID valuer.UUID) ([]string, *model.ApiError) {
// Preload all metrics metadata to avoid redundant ClickHouse queries
// for each metric name lookup, trading memory for query performance
// Good: Appropriate cache duration for static web assets
cache := middleware.NewCache(7 * 24 * time.Hour) // Static builds don't change
}
Always question whether additional cache keys or complex strategies provide measurable benefits over simpler approaches. Document the reasoning behind your caching decisions to help future maintainers understand the trade-offs made.
Enter the URL of a public GitHub repository