Back to all reviewers

Security-critical code review

twentyhq/twenty
Based on 3 comments
TypeScript

Changes to security-sensitive areas like authentication, input validation, and business logic require extra scrutiny and thorough review. These modifications can introduce vulnerabilities if not properly validated.

Security TypeScript

Reviewer Prompt

Changes to security-sensitive areas like authentication, input validation, and business logic require extra scrutiny and thorough review. These modifications can introduce vulnerabilities if not properly validated.

Key areas requiring heightened security review:

  • Authentication and authorization logic changes
  • Input processing and data sanitization
  • Business operations that could be financially abused
  • API endpoints and service layer security controls

When reviewing such changes, verify that:

  • Security implications are thoroughly understood and documented
  • Input validation prevents injection attacks (SQL, CSV, XSS, etc.)
  • Business logic prevents abuse scenarios (e.g., credit manipulation)
  • Changes don’t weaken existing security controls

Example of proper input sanitization:

// Prevent CSV injection by prefixing dangerous formulas
const sanitizedValue = value.startsWith('=') || value.startsWith('+') 
  ? `${CSV_INJECTION_PREVENTION_ZWJ}${value}` 
  : value;

For authentication changes, consider reverting risky modifications if the security impact cannot be clearly demonstrated as safe. As one reviewer noted: “This change is risky. What you’re checking now is not the same as what was checked before.”

3
Comments Analyzed
TypeScript
Primary Language
Security
Category

Source Discussions