Back to all reviewers

Size fields appropriately

vitessio/vitess
Based on 2 comments
Sql

When designing database schemas, choose field types and sizes that accommodate both current and anticipated future data volumes. Undersized fields can cause production issues and limit functionality when data grows beyond initial expectations. Additionally, ensure consistency between related fields that store similar data or participate in the same...

Database Sql

Reviewer Prompt

When designing database schemas, choose field types and sizes that accommodate both current and anticipated future data volumes. Undersized fields can cause production issues and limit functionality when data grows beyond initial expectations. Additionally, ensure consistency between related fields that store similar data or participate in the same operations.

Example:

-- Avoid restrictive size limits for fields that may grow
-- Bad:
`pos`       varbinary(10000) NOT NULL,
`stop_pos`  varbinary(10000) DEFAULT NULL,

-- Better:
`pos`       mediumblob NOT NULL,        -- Up to 16MB
`stop_pos`  mediumblob DEFAULT NULL,    -- Matching type and capacity

For fields containing potentially large data (like position coordinates, serialized objects, or binary data), prefer types with sufficient headroom rather than arbitrary size limitations. This prevents operational issues when edge cases are encountered in production.

2
Comments Analyzed
Sql
Primary Language
Database
Category

Source Discussions